H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Victor Pecci H2H: 2-1

Jimmy Connors holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Victor Pecci won the 1979 Roland Garros semifinal 7-5 6-4 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Victor Pecci
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Pecci #29 7-5 6-4 5-7 6-3 Jimmy Connors #1 Match data Jun 10, 1979* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jimmy Connors 6-4 6-3 Victor Pecci Match data Aug 26, 1976* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Jimmy Connors 7-6 2-6 6-4 Victor Pecci Match data Aug 9, 1975* QF North Conway ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109
Victor Pecci #666 #9 0 2,085 354 244 59.2% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors Victor Pecci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0 1974 2–4 33.3% #318 1,480 0 0
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6 1975 21–21 50.0% #55 1,701 0 0
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17 1976 46–29 61.3% #34 1,804 0 2
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32 1977 38–26 59.4% #38 1,781 0 2
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41 1978 30–24 55.6% #46 1,859 0 3
23 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53 1979 56–19 74.7% #11 1,994 0 6
24 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61 1980 37–20 64.9% #29 1,840 0 7
25 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71 1981 48–20 70.6% #16 1,822 0 9
26 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79 1982 19–19 50.0% #68 1,705 0 9
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85 1983 18–15 54.5% #56 1,721 0 10
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89 1984 17–12 58.6% #38 1,780 0 10
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96 1985 12–19 38.7% #110 1,610 0 10
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100 1986 4–6 40.0% #140 1,578 0 10
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105 1987 6–8 42.9% #256 1,546 0 10
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105 — — — — — — —
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105 — — — — — — —
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105 — — — — — — —
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107 — — — — — — —
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109 — — — — — — —
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109 — — — — — — —
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Connors Victor Pecci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7% 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 1976 10 5 15 66.7% 27 16 43 62.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
21 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9% 1977 0 3 3 0.0% 38 21 59 64.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5% 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 23 13 36 63.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2% 1979 8 3 11 72.7% 39 10 49 79.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 26 13 39 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2% 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 43 16 59 72.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — — — — —
28 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 1986 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0% 1987 3 1 4 75.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2% — 41 33 74 55.4% 274 172 446 61.4% 21 15 36 58.3% 18 24 42 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Connors Victor Pecci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1972 1482 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.10
17 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.24 1973 1469 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
18 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +96 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 101.4 +2.95 1974 1481 115.3 — — — — — +28 — 30.8% -0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.27
19 1972 1996 147.2 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 102.1 +3.34 1975 1702 141.5 — — — — -68 -44 — 50.5% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 104.2 -1.49
20 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +94 -299 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) 98.3 0.00 1976 1805 139.7 — — — — -50 -14 — 59.8% +0.66 13–12 (52%) 15–14 (52%) 104.7 +3.03
21 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +65 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 104.4 +2.36 1977 1781 139.2 — — — — -144 +39 — 56.6% +0.31 16–12 (57%) 12–10 (55%) 97.8 +5.37
22 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +129 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.69 1978 1859 154.6 — — — — -233 +61 -248 56.3% +0.61 8–14 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 94.7 -1.68
23 1976 2386 175.2 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) 108.1 -2.86 1979 1995 161.2 — — — — -286 +142 -233 68.3% +1.12 14–5 (74%) 12–11 (52%) 105.7 -2.65
24 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 -3.18 1980 1840 140.1 — — — — -135 +87 -1 59.7% +0.71 11–5 (69%) 9–7 (56%) 102.6 +1.02
25 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +39 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 101.5 -2.85 1981 1822 154.3 — — — — -117 +93 — 64.4% +0.90 15–6 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 98.0 -1.04
26 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) 103.4 -4.08 1982 1705 137.3 — — — — +2 +108 +7 50.0% +0.10 8–8 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -1.68
27 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +167 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) 95.4 -2.66 1983 1721 141.2 — — — — -4 +30 — 56.0% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 8–2 (80%) 101.4 +0.86
28 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +6 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 99.9 -3.29 1984 1781 136.2 — — — — -63 +21 — 53.5% +0.11 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 105.9 +0.01
29 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) 105.8 -4.60 1985 1610 138.7 — — — — +35 +76 — 37.3% -0.55 6–3 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -1.77
30 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 102.9 -3.68 1986 1579 116.2 — — — — — +60 — 44.0% -0.28 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.63
31 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) 101.2 -6.13 1987 1546 112.6 — — — — +114 +26 — 46.4% +0.21 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +1.72
32 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 99.0 -3.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) 96.2 -2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) 101.5 -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 93.7 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 97.8 -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2442 169.3 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45 — 2086 150.5 — — — — -101 +57 -119 56.8% +0.47 112–83 (57%) 94–77 (55%) 103.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.