H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Albert Costa H2H: 1-5

Albert Costa holds a 5–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2004 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Albert Costa #39 6-4 6-2 Jiri Novak #17 Match data
Nov 1, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Costa #31 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Jiri Novak #48 Match data
Jul 15, 2000* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Costa #17 6-3 6-1 Jiri Novak #44 Match data
Aug 12, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jiri Novak #42 7-6(3) 7-6(6) Albert Costa #22 Match data
Apr 24, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Albert Costa #14 4-6 6-2 6-4 Jiri Novak #62 Match data
Apr 10, 1998* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Costa #21 6-3 6-4 Jiri Novak #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12