H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 2-0
Jiri Novak holds a 2–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2006 US Open first round 7-5 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 7-5 6-2 7-5 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 3-6 6-7(1) 6-0 6-3 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Arnaud Clement | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |