H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 0-1
Benjamin Becker holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2006 Tokyo fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |