H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-3

Jiri Novak and Cedric Pioline are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–2 on clay, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2002 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 4-6 6-4.

CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jiri Novak #15 6-4 4-6 6-4 Cedric Pioline #93 Match data
Jun 1, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jiri Novak #55 2-6 6-4 6-2 7-5 Cedric Pioline #53 Match data
May 17, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #5 7-6(3) 6-2 Jiri Novak #39 Match data
Apr 20, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #12 6-4 6-3 Jiri Novak #37 Match data
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jiri Novak #33 6-4 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Apr 29, 1999* Prague ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #27 7-6(6) 0-6 7-6(4) Jiri Novak #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5