H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 0-2
Chris Woodruff holds a 2–0 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 2000 Paris Masters second round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Chris Woodruff | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-2 7-6(6) 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Chris Woodruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |