H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 0-1
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |