H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 2-2
Jiri Novak and Greg Rusedski are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2003 Cincinnati Masters second round 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2002* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(2) | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2001* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 6-2 6-2 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1999* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Novak | 6-2 6-2 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Greg Rusedski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 |