Jiri Novak
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on carpet, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2004 Shanghai Masters semifinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Canas | 6-1 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data | Oct 2, 2004* | SF | Shanghai Masters | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Guillermo Canas | 6-4 6-0 | Jiri Novak | Match data | Jul 20, 2002* | SF | Stuttgart Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Jiri Novak | 7-6(6) 7-6(1) | Guillermo Canas | Match data | Oct 5, 2001* | R16 | Moscow | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 319 | 253 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 1,991 | 245 | 189 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #52 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,768 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,870 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,817 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #79 | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,626 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1999 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1997 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2000 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2001 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1999 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2002 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2000 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2003 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2004 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 27 | 2002 | 33 | 15 | 48 | 68.8% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2005 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2007 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2005 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2008 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2006 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2009 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 153 | 116 | 269 | 56.9% | 119 | 90 | 209 | 56.9% | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 30 | 29 | 59 | 50.8% | — | 97 | 78 | 175 | 55.4% | 117 | 82 | 199 | 58.8% | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 503/572 of Jiri Novak's and 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 63.3% | 58.9% | 36.4% | 48.5% | 20.6% | 50.4% | 39.6% | 1996 | 1/3 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 47.6% | 62.5% | 54.5% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 58.3% | 40.7% |
| 19 | 1994 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 55.1% | 60.5% | 40.0% | 22.2% | 28.6% | 51.3% | 37.5% | 1997 | 5/5 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 50.9% | 70.7% | 47.1% | 52.2% | 43.1% | 58.5% | 38.0% |
| 20 | 1995 | 13/14 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 66.4% | 61.6% | 45.2% | 55.0% | 41.9% | 56.6% | 42.7% | 1998 | 14/20 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 53.2% | 72.2% | 46.0% | 62.4% | 40.8% | 59.7% | 37.0% |
| 21 | 1996 | 51/54 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 65.5% | 66.4% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 52.3% | 60.2% | 40.7% | 1999 | 31/38 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 57.2% | 69.1% | 52.5% | 63.4% | 42.8% | 61.6% | 41.1% |
| 22 | 1997 | 35/39 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 67.9% | 70.2% | 49.2% | 60.7% | 44.1% | 63.0% | 39.6% | 2000 | 15/17 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 53.3% | 67.7% | 44.7% | 44.1% | 44.4% | 57.1% | 38.5% |
| 23 | 1998 | 34/41 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 64.0% | 67.7% | 53.0% | 54.3% | 40.5% | 61.9% | 41.5% | 2001 | 57/66 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 60.7% | 71.3% | 51.9% | 58.7% | 44.3% | 63.7% | 42.8% |
| 24 | 1999 | 41/54 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 62.7% | 68.1% | 51.5% | 60.6% | 46.1% | 62.0% | 41.0% | 2002 | 58/63 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 59.7% | 73.3% | 54.6% | 56.6% | 43.3% | 65.7% | 41.4% |
| 25 | 2000 | 38/50 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 65.1% | 68.5% | 50.2% | 57.4% | 36.4% | 62.1% | 39.0% | 2003 | 9/9 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 62.9% | 71.5% | 46.3% | 60.8% | 35.2% | 62.1% | 39.9% |
| 26 | 2001 | 37/45 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 64.2% | 71.3% | 53.1% | 54.8% | 46.2% | 64.9% | 41.6% | 2004 | 61/61 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 58.7% | 73.8% | 54.8% | 59.2% | 48.3% | 66.0% | 41.5% |
| 27 | 2002 | 64/77 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 65.9% | 70.8% | 53.7% | 59.4% | 45.4% | 64.9% | 42.4% | 2005 | 32/33 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 60.6% | 70.6% | 53.3% | 63.3% | 47.0% | 64.3% | 43.3% |
| 28 | 2003 | 63/66 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 65.5% | 70.8% | 52.2% | 57.9% | 45.1% | 64.2% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 56/59 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 64.5% | 71.6% | 50.9% | 59.8% | 46.1% | 63.9% | 40.3% | 2007 | 58/59 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 57.3% | 73.5% | 52.7% | 60.3% | 48.0% | 64.7% | 40.5% |
| 30 | 2005 | 43/45 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 65.3% | 66.8% | 49.9% | 60.4% | 40.3% | 61.0% | 39.7% | 2008 | 39/42 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 53.9% | 71.1% | 50.0% | 54.1% | 44.9% | 61.4% | 38.9% |
| 31 | 2006 | 25/25 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 64.8% | 69.2% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 36.5% | 62.2% | 37.2% | 2009 | 18/18 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 51.2% | 73.2% | 49.3% | 62.8% | 49.0% | 62.0% | 35.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1517 | 109.9 | +2.28 | +0.87 | 0.799 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.20 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | -0.14 | 1996 | 1462 | 97.5 | +1.04 | -2.26 | 0.976 | 49.1% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.33 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1515 | 112.8 | +4.42 | +2.29 | 0.770 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.30 | 1997 | 1461 | 111.0 | +1.67 | -1.40 | 0.916 | 47.7% | +43 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.25 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1541 | 124.9 | -1.61 | +1.61 | 0.985 | 49.3% | -3 | +37 | — | 34.4% | -0.44 | 2–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.13 | 1998 | 1481 | 121.3 | -1.19 | -0.67 | 0.917 | 48.3% | +38 | +4 | +126 | 40.4% | -0.50 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.36 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1693 | 141.1 | -1.19 | +2.05 | 1.024 | 50.5% | -5 | -39 | — | 52.9% | +0.16 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +0.91 | 1999 | 1575 | 128.1 | +0.38 | +2.60 | 1.070 | 51.2% | -99 | +35 | +40 | 42.7% | -0.46 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -1.21 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1693 | 141.4 | +0.90 | +1.84 | 1.072 | 51.2% | +32 | -54 | — | 51.0% | +0.38 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | +0.10 | 2000 | 1530 | 126.2 | -2.48 | +0.32 | 0.898 | 47.3% | -56 | +30 | — | 34.1% | -0.98 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1710 | 138.8 | -0.13 | +2.19 | 1.090 | 51.3% | -48 | +49 | — | 47.2% | +0.06 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–15 (29%) | — | -0.98 | 2001 | 1839 | 149.5 | +2.44 | +4.53 | 1.177 | 52.9% | -76 | -16 | -135 | 60.0% | +0.79 | 15–5 (75%) | 9–13 (41%) | — | +0.72 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1769 | 144.0 | +0.38 | +2.95 | 1.078 | 51.4% | -34 | +17 | -167 | 49.3% | +0.21 | 13–7 (65%) | 9–18 (33%) | — | -1.88 | 2002 | 1856 | 149.5 | +2.94 | +3.27 | 1.208 | 53.1% | -23 | +31 | -142 | 60.5% | +0.74 | 11–10 (52%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +1.54 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1698 | 135.5 | +0.88 | +1.43 | 1.030 | 50.2% | -24 | +91 | — | 46.3% | -0.30 | 9–6 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.98 | 2003 | 1804 | 118.1 | -0.44 | +1.57 | 1.054 | 50.7% | -9 | — | — | 52.2% | +0.09 | 2–0 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.24 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1861 | 155.0 | +2.25 | +3.70 | 1.185 | 52.9% | -87 | +108 | — | 59.1% | +0.73 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -2.12 | 2004 | 1901 | 152.0 | +3.45 | +3.93 | 1.218 | 53.4% | +11 | +13 | -212 | 61.9% | +0.86 | 10–11 (48%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | -1.25 |
| 27 | 2002 | 1907 | 151.6 | +2.81 | +4.54 | 1.206 | 53.4% | -4 | +6 | -360 | 61.1% | +0.94 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | +1.43 | 2005 | 1871 | 147.8 | +2.24 | +5.12 | 1.212 | 53.3% | +67 | +11 | -120 | 64.1% | +1.00 | 2–5 (29%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +0.92 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1830 | 140.9 | +1.53 | +2.70 | 1.131 | 52.0% | 0 | +90 | -190 | 58.4% | +0.62 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | +1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 1908 | 146.7 | +1.37 | +3.15 | 1.115 | 52.0% | +30 | -71 | -246 | 59.0% | +0.75 | 11–3 (79%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -0.35 | 2007 | 1818 | 155.4 | +2.37 | +3.32 | 1.149 | 52.4% | +52 | +124 | -35 | 64.0% | +0.84 | 5–7 (42%) | 18–6 (75%) | — | -1.01 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1677 | 131.0 | -1.54 | +1.71 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +80 | +90 | +18 | 50.9% | +0.14 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +2.73 | 2008 | 1685 | 140.5 | -1.38 | +1.60 | 1.006 | 50.1% | +67 | +164 | +92 | 48.0% | 0.00 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +1.08 |
| 31 | 2006 | 1717 | 130.7 | +0.78 | -0.28 | 0.984 | 49.7% | +72 | -5 | -79 | 47.5% | -0.21 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.36 | 2009 | 1627 | 123.4 | -1.48 | -0.18 | 0.946 | 49.5% | +28 | +135 | — | 37.5% | -0.44 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.68 |
| Career | — | 1940 | 148.5 | +0.78 | +2.55 | 1.087 | 51.4% | -1 | +31 | -173 | 53.4% | +0.35 | 108–73 (60%) | 88–111 (44%) | 101.4 | -0.15 | — | 1992 | 149.7 | +1.54 | +2.98 | 1.119 | 51.9% | 0 | +50 | -51 | 54.9% | +0.39 | 60–69 (47%) | 81–78 (51%) | 97.0 | +0.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Gaston Gaudio | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 6 | 1 | 7 | Mar 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Alberto Martin | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Gustavo Kuerten | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 30, 2004 | H2H |