H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 1-2
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on carpet, while Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2004 Shanghai semifinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Guillermo Canas | 6-1 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2002* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-4 6-0 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2001* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jiri Novak | 7-6(6) 7-6(1) | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |