H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-1
Jiri Novak and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2004 Tokyo third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 7-5 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2004* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-3 6-3 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |