H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-0
Jiri Novak holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 1996 Memphis third round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |