H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-5

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2004 Tokyo semifinal 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Novak
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2004* Tokyo ATP 250 SF Hard Jiri Novak #28 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #3 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-2 6-1 Jiri Novak #22 Match data
Sep 4, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-2 7-5 Jiri Novak #14 Match data
May 18, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-3 Jiri Novak #15 Match data
Sep 3, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-3 6-3 6-3 Jiri Novak #39 Match data
Jan 8, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #100 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 Jiri Novak #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30