H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Magnus Norman H2H: 2-2
Jiri Novak and Magnus Norman are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 2–1 on clay, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2003 Shanghai quarterfinal 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jiri Novak | 2-1 (ret.) | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1999* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-1 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1998* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-1 6-3 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1998* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Novak | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Magnus Norman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |