H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 1-2
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 Shanghai final 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-2 6-1 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| May 9, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Novak | 6-4 6-1 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 6-1 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |