H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 0-3
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–0 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2003 Miami Masters second round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-6(7) 7-6(4) | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-3 7-5 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |