H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 2-1
Jiri Novak holds a 2–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 5, 2000* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Novak | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jiri Novak | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |
| 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |