Jiri Novak
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jiri Novak and Tim Henman are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2004 Swiss Indoors quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tim Henman | Match data | Oct 30, 2004* | QF | Swiss Indoors | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Jiri Novak | 6-3 6-3 | Tim Henman | Match data | Aug 17, 2004* | R64 | Athens Olympics | Olympics | Hard |
| Tim Henman | 5-7 6-1 7-5 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data | May 28, 1999* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Tim Henman | 7-6(4) 7-5 5-7 4-6 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data | Jun 24, 1998* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 319 | 253 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,026 | 469 | 263 | 64.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #52 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #29 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,768 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,939 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,888 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,971 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2004 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,867 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,683 | 0 | 11 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1995 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1996 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1996 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% |
| 22 | 1997 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1997 | 27 | 11 | 38 | 71.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 23 | 1998 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1998 | 40 | 18 | 58 | 69.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 1999 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1999 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 25 | 2000 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 41 | 14 | 55 | 74.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 2001 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2001 | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% |
| 27 | 2002 | 33 | 15 | 48 | 68.8% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2002 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | 2003 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2003 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% |
| 29 | 2004 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2004 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 30 | 2005 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2005 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2006 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 153 | 116 | 269 | 56.9% | 119 | 90 | 209 | 56.9% | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 30 | 29 | 59 | 50.8% | — | 266 | 147 | 413 | 64.4% | 56 | 46 | 102 | 54.9% | 78 | 34 | 112 | 69.6% | 69 | 36 | 105 | 65.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 503/572 of Jiri Novak's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 63.3% | 58.9% | 36.4% | 48.5% | 20.6% | 50.4% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 55.1% | 60.5% | 40.0% | 22.2% | 28.6% | 51.3% | 37.5% | 1994 | 5/8 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 62.7% | 65.7% | 41.8% | 48.7% | 36.9% | 56.9% | 33.4% |
| 20 | 1995 | 13/14 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 66.4% | 61.6% | 45.2% | 55.0% | 41.9% | 56.6% | 42.7% | 1995 | 11/14 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 55.9% | 69.5% | 47.7% | 53.7% | 54.6% | 60.1% | 34.7% |
| 21 | 1996 | 51/54 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 65.5% | 66.4% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 52.3% | 60.2% | 40.7% | 1996 | 50/63 | 7.1 | 3.7 | 56.7% | 73.9% | 51.4% | 58.8% | 39.0% | 64.4% | 36.7% |
| 22 | 1997 | 35/39 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 67.9% | 70.2% | 49.2% | 60.7% | 44.1% | 63.0% | 39.6% | 1997 | 63/70 | 8.3 | 4.8 | 51.2% | 80.7% | 50.4% | 61.5% | 38.9% | 65.8% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 1998 | 34/41 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 64.0% | 67.7% | 53.0% | 54.3% | 40.5% | 61.9% | 41.5% | 1998 | 71/84 | 7.2 | 4.1 | 52.9% | 77.8% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 45.5% | 64.6% | 39.3% |
| 24 | 1999 | 41/54 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 62.7% | 68.1% | 51.5% | 60.6% | 46.1% | 62.0% | 41.0% | 1999 | 57/66 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 54.9% | 76.7% | 50.5% | 62.0% | 41.3% | 64.8% | 40.2% |
| 25 | 2000 | 38/50 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 65.1% | 68.5% | 50.2% | 57.4% | 36.4% | 62.1% | 39.0% | 2000 | 62/79 | 7.0 | 4.1 | 55.2% | 77.1% | 50.9% | 68.9% | 40.4% | 65.4% | 41.2% |
| 26 | 2001 | 37/45 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 64.2% | 71.3% | 53.1% | 54.8% | 46.2% | 64.9% | 41.6% | 2001 | 58/69 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 60.9% | 74.3% | 53.1% | 61.1% | 47.4% | 66.2% | 42.8% |
| 27 | 2002 | 64/77 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 65.9% | 70.8% | 53.7% | 59.4% | 45.4% | 64.9% | 42.4% | 2002 | 54/63 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 64.4% | 70.8% | 52.9% | 63.3% | 45.7% | 64.3% | 40.8% |
| 28 | 2003 | 63/66 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 65.5% | 70.8% | 52.2% | 57.9% | 45.1% | 64.2% | 40.5% | 2003 | 45/46 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 58.8% | 72.7% | 51.8% | 59.3% | 47.9% | 64.1% | 39.5% |
| 29 | 2004 | 56/59 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 64.5% | 71.6% | 50.9% | 59.8% | 46.1% | 63.9% | 40.3% | 2004 | 60/62 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 58.7% | 74.2% | 55.5% | 59.4% | 49.0% | 66.6% | 39.1% |
| 30 | 2005 | 43/45 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 65.3% | 66.8% | 49.9% | 60.4% | 40.3% | 61.0% | 39.7% | 2005 | 41/41 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 61.9% | 73.8% | 52.4% | 62.5% | 45.6% | 65.7% | 38.2% |
| 31 | 2006 | 25/25 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 64.8% | 69.2% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 36.5% | 62.2% | 37.2% | 2006 | 51/51 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 61.5% | 71.5% | 51.9% | 59.0% | 48.7% | 63.8% | 38.9% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16/16 | 7.6 | 4.3 | 62.5% | 69.6% | 51.9% | 65.9% | 40.5% | 62.9% | 34.5% |
| Career | — | 503/572 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 65.1% | 69.1% | 51.0% | 57.9% | 44.0% | 62.7% | 40.6% | — | 644/732 | 6.0 | 3.7 | 57.7% | 74.8% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 44.4% | 64.9% | 39.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1517 | 109.9 | +2.28 | +0.87 | 0.799 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.20 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 1515 | 112.8 | +4.42 | +2.29 | 0.770 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.30 | 1994 | 1513 | 116.8 | -1.59 | -1.36 | 0.776 | 45.4% | +47 | — | +42 | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.33 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1541 | 124.9 | -1.61 | +1.61 | 0.985 | 49.3% | -3 | +37 | — | 34.4% | -0.44 | 2–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.13 | 1995 | 1572 | 115.6 | -2.09 | -1.97 | 0.869 | 47.8% | 0 | — | +26 | 45.7% | -0.43 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.04 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1693 | 141.1 | -1.19 | +2.05 | 1.024 | 50.5% | -5 | -39 | — | 52.9% | +0.16 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +0.91 | 1996 | 1811 | 143.5 | +1.77 | -0.36 | 1.030 | 50.5% | -28 | — | -52 | 58.2% | +0.39 | 8–11 (42%) | 24–14 (63%) | — | -0.81 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1693 | 141.4 | +0.90 | +1.84 | 1.072 | 51.2% | +32 | -54 | — | 51.0% | +0.38 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | +0.10 | 1997 | 1896 | 147.8 | +3.33 | +0.92 | 1.120 | 51.9% | 0 | -414 | -26 | 59.7% | +0.52 | 17–9 (65%) | 18–11 (62%) | — | +0.85 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1710 | 138.8 | -0.13 | +2.19 | 1.090 | 51.3% | -48 | +49 | — | 47.2% | +0.06 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–15 (29%) | — | -0.98 | 1998 | 1961 | 159.5 | +2.85 | +2.23 | 1.107 | 52.0% | -1 | -493 | +17 | 61.8% | +0.65 | 17–12 (59%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -1.62 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1769 | 144.0 | +0.38 | +2.95 | 1.078 | 51.4% | -34 | +17 | -167 | 49.3% | +0.21 | 13–7 (65%) | 9–18 (33%) | — | -1.88 | 1999 | 1787 | 151.2 | +2.50 | +2.30 | 1.142 | 52.1% | -11 | -152 | +243 | 58.8% | +0.71 | 13–13 (50%) | 14–16 (47%) | — | +0.72 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1698 | 135.5 | +0.88 | +1.43 | 1.030 | 50.2% | -24 | +91 | — | 46.3% | -0.30 | 9–6 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.98 | 2000 | 1939 | 155.2 | +3.31 | +3.56 | 1.191 | 53.1% | +29 | -234 | +63 | 66.7% | +1.07 | 11–12 (48%) | 17–10 (63%) | — | +0.25 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1861 | 155.0 | +2.25 | +3.70 | 1.185 | 52.9% | -87 | +108 | — | 59.1% | +0.73 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -2.12 | 2001 | 1922 | 152.8 | +3.40 | +4.67 | 1.266 | 54.3% | -2 | -179 | +132 | 67.0% | +1.29 | 11–12 (48%) | 17–14 (55%) | — | +2.30 |
| 27 | 2002 | 1907 | 151.6 | +2.81 | +4.54 | 1.206 | 53.4% | -4 | +6 | -360 | 61.1% | +0.94 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | +1.43 | 2002 | 1888 | 153.2 | +2.14 | +3.42 | 1.145 | 52.4% | +19 | -133 | +186 | 66.3% | +1.06 | 14–8 (64%) | 9–15 (38%) | — | +0.21 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1830 | 140.9 | +1.53 | +2.70 | 1.131 | 52.0% | 0 | +90 | -190 | 58.4% | +0.62 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | +1.97 | 2003 | 1972 | 147.0 | +1.73 | +3.09 | 1.100 | 51.8% | -9 | -200 | +151 | 60.0% | +0.66 | 8–2 (80%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | -2.72 |
| 29 | 2004 | 1908 | 146.7 | +1.37 | +3.15 | 1.115 | 52.0% | +30 | -71 | -246 | 59.0% | +0.75 | 11–3 (79%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -0.35 | 2004 | 1914 | 154.9 | +3.57 | +2.65 | 1.174 | 52.8% | +17 | -34 | +142 | 60.8% | +0.86 | 11–7 (61%) | 12–18 (40%) | — | +0.11 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1677 | 131.0 | -1.54 | +1.71 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +80 | +90 | +18 | 50.9% | +0.14 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +2.73 | 2005 | 1746 | 146.2 | +2.43 | +1.53 | 1.114 | 51.8% | +62 | +91 | +293 | 55.6% | +0.50 | 6–8 (43%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | +0.77 |
| 31 | 2006 | 1717 | 130.7 | +0.78 | -0.28 | 0.984 | 49.7% | +72 | -5 | -79 | 47.5% | -0.21 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.36 | 2006 | 1868 | 152.1 | +1.77 | +2.07 | 1.076 | 51.4% | -18 | -56 | +205 | 59.5% | +0.54 | 5–8 (38%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | -2.94 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1684 | 119.8 | -0.80 | -0.33 | 0.931 | 49.2% | +55 | +34 | +277 | 40.0% | -0.34 | 1–8 (11%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.06 |
| Career | — | 1940 | 148.5 | +0.78 | +2.55 | 1.087 | 51.4% | -1 | +31 | -173 | 53.4% | +0.35 | 108–73 (60%) | 88–111 (44%) | 101.4 | -0.15 | — | 2026 | 155.9 | +2.48 | +2.23 | 1.121 | 52.1% | +5 | -155 | +114 | 60.6% | +0.70 | 125–112 (53%) | 161–141 (53%) | 96.1 | -0.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 6 | 7 | 13 | Oct 8, 2006 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 5 | 8 | 13 | Aug 19, 2000 | H2H |
| Hicham Arazi | 10 | 2 | 12 | Aug 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 8 | 2 | 10 | Aug 30, 2006 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jun 17, 2006 | H2H |