H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-3
Todd Martin holds a 3–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 6-7(3) 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Todd Martin | 6-7(3) 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-2 6-4 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1999* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Todd Martin | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 | Jiri Novak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |