H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-3

Todd Martin holds a 3–1 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 64 6-7(3) 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Novak

CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H

1 – 3

4 main-draw meetings

Todd Martin

USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Todd Martin #34	6-7(3) 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4	Jiri Novak #42	Match data	Jun 29, 2001*	R64	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Todd Martin #4	6-2 6-4	Jiri Novak #33	Match data	Oct 30, 1999*	R16	Stuttgart Masters	Masters 1000	Hard
Jiri Novak #34	7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-4	Todd Martin #4	Match data	Oct 14, 1999*	R32	Vienna Open	ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500	Hard
Todd Martin #14	7-6(5) 6-4 6-4	Jiri Novak #59	Match data	Jun 25, 1999*	R64	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Jiri Novak	#930	#5	2,355	1,940	319	253	55.8%	0	0	0	1	6	7
Todd Martin	#145	#4	2,969	2,064	398	223	64.1%	0	0	0	3	5	8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jiri Novak							Todd Martin
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
18	1993	1–1	50.0%	#286	1,516	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	0–1	0.0%	#205	1,515	0	0	1990	3–4	42.9%	#269	1,515	0	0
20	1995	5–9	35.7%	#53	1,541	0	0	1991	10–8	55.6%	#134	1,652	0	0
21	1996	30–24	55.6%	#52	1,693	0	1	1992	22–19	53.7%	#87	1,724	0	0
22	1997	20–19	51.3%	#48	1,692	0	1	1993	45–23	66.2%	#13	1,886	0	1
23	1998	20–21	48.8%	#75	1,709	0	2	1994	50–19	72.5%	#10	1,945	0	3
24	1999	28–26	51.9%	#40	1,768	0	2	1995	45–21	68.2%	#18	1,913	0	4
25	2000	24–26	48.0%	#53	1,698	0	2	1996	49–20	71.0%	#12	1,923	0	5
26	2001	28–17	62.2%	#29	1,860	0	4	1997	13–7	65.0%	#81	1,913	0	5
27	2002	50–27	64.9%	#7	1,907	0	4	1998	43–20	68.3%	#16	1,998	0	7
28	2003	41–25	62.1%	#13	1,829	0	5	1999	42–17	71.2%	#7	1,914	0	8
29	2004	38–21	64.4%	#24	1,908	0	7	2000	14–12	53.8%	#55	1,862	0	8
30	2005	22–23	48.9%	#48	1,677	0	7	2001	13–11	54.2%	#57	1,816	0	8
31	2006	12–13	48.0%	#129	1,717	0	7	2002	24–16	60.0%	#47	1,785	0	8
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	15–11	57.7%	#68	1,842	0	8
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	10–15	40.0%	#145	1,688	0	8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Jiri Novak																	Todd Martin
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
18	1993	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—
20	1995	0	1	1	0.0%	4	7	11	36.4%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1991	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	2	2	4	50.0%
21	1996	13	9	22	59.1%	13	10	23	56.5%	1	1	2	50.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	1992	12	10	22	54.5%	3	3	6	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	3	3	6	50.0%
22	1997	16	12	28	57.1%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1993	21	12	33	63.6%	10	4	14	71.4%	8	2	10	80.0%	6	5	11	54.5%
23	1998	2	6	8	25.0%	15	11	26	57.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1994	22	8	30	73.3%	10	4	14	71.4%	10	1	11	90.9%	8	6	14	57.1%
24	1999	15	12	27	55.6%	10	9	19	52.6%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1995	25	10	35	71.4%	7	4	11	63.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	9	5	14	64.3%
25	2000	15	16	31	48.4%	8	7	15	53.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1996	29	10	39	74.4%	6	4	10	60.0%	7	2	9	77.8%	7	4	11	63.6%
26	2001	7	10	17	41.2%	15	4	19	78.9%	1	1	2	50.0%	5	2	7	71.4%	1997	7	3	10	70.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	6	4	10	60.0%
27	2002	33	15	48	68.8%	15	7	22	68.2%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	1998	26	12	38	68.4%	7	3	10	70.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	7	3	10	70.0%
28	2003	19	13	32	59.4%	12	6	18	66.7%	6	3	9	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	1999	30	11	41	73.2%	7	2	9	77.8%	5	2	7	71.4%	0	2	2	0.0%
29	2004	19	10	29	65.5%	11	8	19	57.9%	3	2	5	60.0%	5	1	6	83.3%	2000	11	7	18	61.1%	1	3	4	25.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2005	9	10	19	47.4%	10	9	19	52.6%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	2001	8	6	14	57.1%	2	4	6	33.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—
31	2006	5	2	7	71.4%	5	7	12	41.7%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	2002	17	11	28	60.7%	3	3	6	50.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	10	7	17	58.8%	2	2	4	50.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	5	9	14	35.7%	3	4	7	42.9%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—
Career	—	153	116	269	56.9%	119	90	209	56.9%	17	18	35	48.6%	30	29	59	50.8%	—	227	122	349	65.0%	64	42	106	60.4%	59	25	84	70.2%	48	34	82	58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Jiri Novak																Todd Martin
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
18	1993	1517	109.9	+2.28	+0.87	0.799	44.3%	—	—	—	40.0%	-2.20	1–0	2–0	—	-0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1994	1515	112.8	+4.42	+2.29	0.770	43.7%	—	—	—	33.3%	-3.00	0–1	1–0	—	-0.30	1990	1516	114.1	—	—	—	—	+28	—	—	40.0%	0.00	2–0	0–4 (0%)	—	+0.50
20	1995	1541	124.9	-1.61	+1.61	0.985	49.3%	-3	+37	—	34.4%	-0.44	2–0	1–3 (25%)	—	+0.13	1991	1652	125.4	—	—	—	—	-62	-40	-7	55.8%	+0.56	2–3 (40%)	3–3 (50%)	100.0	+1.12
21	1996	1693	141.1	-1.19	+2.05	1.024	50.5%	-5	-39	—	52.9%	+0.16	13–9 (59%)	10–8 (56%)	107.2	+0.91	1992	1724	141.4	—	—	—	—	-19	-110	-46	55.8%	+0.54	4–9 (31%)	8–8 (50%)	97.1	+0.21
22	1997	1693	141.4	+0.90	+1.84	1.072	51.2%	+32	-54	—	51.0%	+0.38	7–7 (50%)	5–11 (31%)	94.5	+0.10	1993	1887	155.8	—	—	—	—	-16	-193	-64	62.4%	+0.78	10–9 (53%)	16–17 (48%)	100.9	-0.69
23	1998	1710	138.8	-0.13	+2.19	1.090	51.3%	-48	+49	—	47.2%	+0.06	11–9 (55%)	6–15 (29%)	97.0	-0.98	1994	1945	157.2	—	—	—	—	-18	-177	+80	64.0%	+0.94	19–8 (70%)	26–17 (60%)	107.1	-1.38
24	1999	1769	144.0	+0.38	+2.95	1.078	51.4%	-34	+17	-167	49.3%	+0.21	13–7 (65%)	9–18 (33%)	100.1	-1.88	1995	1913	152.5	—	—	—	—	+27	-141	+46	62.5%	+0.71	11–4 (73%)	20–12 (63%)	108.7	-0.11
25	2000	1698	135.5	+0.88	+1.43	1.030	50.2%	-24	+91	—	46.3%	-0.30	9–6 (60%)	9–7 (56%)	106.4	-0.98	1996	1923	161.1	—	—	—	—	+26	-122	+82	66.3%	+1.07	11–10 (52%)	15–12 (56%)	98.3	-1.56
26	2001	1861	155.0	+2.25	+3.70	1.185	52.9%	-87	+108	—	59.1%	+0.73	8–5 (62%)	8–9 (47%)	103.0	-2.12	1997	1914	152.5	—	—	—	—	+27	—	—	63.3%	+0.53	2–4 (33%)	6–3 (67%)	97.1	-1.34
27	2002	1907	151.6	+2.81	+4.54	1.206	53.4%	-4	+6	-360	61.1%	+0.94	12–6 (67%)	7–11 (39%)	98.8	+1.43	1998	1999	161.9	—	—	—	—	+10	-105	-16	64.0%	+0.82	12–7 (63%)	19–11 (63%)	106.8	-4.34
28	2003	1830	140.9	+1.53	+2.70	1.131	52.0%	0	+90	-190	58.4%	+0.62	13–9 (59%)	10–12 (45%)	97.4	+1.97	1999	1914	156.7	—	—	—	—	+32	+22	+54	63.2%	+0.70	14–10 (58%)	26–16 (62%)	99.2	-0.18
29	2004	1908	146.7	+1.37	+3.15	1.115	52.0%	+30	-71	-246	59.0%	+0.75	11–3 (79%)	7–5 (58%)	107.8	-0.35	2000	1862	141.9	—	—	—	—	+57	+9	+96	54.5%	+0.48	3–4 (43%)	7–10 (41%)	93.4	-0.87
30	2005	1677	131.0	-1.54	+1.71	1.018	50.2%	+80	+90	+18	50.9%	+0.14	5–7 (42%)	7–7 (50%)	95.1	+2.73	2001	1816	132.4	—	—	—	—	+63	-59	+147	51.3%	-0.17	6–3 (67%)	6–5 (55%)	100.3	-0.33
31	2006	1717	130.7	+0.78	-0.28	0.984	49.7%	+72	-5	-79	47.5%	-0.21	3–4 (43%)	6–5 (55%)	99.7	-1.36	2002	1786	147.1	—	—	—	—	+51	-34	+125	58.3%	+0.40	6–6 (50%)	14–10 (58%)	98.5	-2.19
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	1842	133.5	+2.69	+0.10	1.096	51.8%	+8	-108	+98	61.8%	+0.46	1–5 (17%)	9–6 (60%)	94.9	-0.41
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	1688	130.3	+1.82	+0.03	1.029	50.4%	+23	+23	+195	43.8%	-0.21	5–6 (45%)	10–9 (53%)	98.0	-1.17
Career	—	1940	148.5	+0.78	+2.55	1.087	51.4%	-1	+31	-173	53.4%	+0.35	108–73 (60%)	88–111 (44%)	101.4	-0.15	—	2064	158.1	+2.25	+0.06	1.062	51.1%	+15	-99	+51	60.5%	+0.64	108–88 (55%)	185–143 (56%)	101.2	-2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Jiri Novak's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Carlos Moya	4	6	10	Jul 27, 2006	H2H
Mikhail Youzhny	4	6	10	Nov 4, 2004	H2H
Dominik Hrbaty	5	4	9	Aug 11, 2005	H2H
Roger Federer	4	5	9	Jun 12, 2004	H2H
Felix Mantilla	4	4	8	May 27, 2005	H2H

Todd Martin's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pete Sampras	4	18	22	Apr 27, 2002	H2H
Andre Agassi	5	13	18	Jan 26, 2001	H2H
Richey Reneberg	8	4	12	Sep 3, 1999	H2H
Goran Ivanisevic	5	7	12	Jun 30, 1999	H2H
Yevgeny Kafelnikov	3	7	10	Mar 17, 2002	H2H