H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–2 lead over Jiri Novak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2005 Halle third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Novak
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2005* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Tommy Haas #23 6-4 6-1 Jiri Novak #27 Match data
Oct 21, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #26 6-1 6-4 Jiri Novak #21 Match data
Jun 12, 2004* Halle ATP 250 QF Grass Jiri Novak #19 6-4 7-6(1) Tommy Haas #112 Match data
Oct 12, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #16 7-6(3) 6-3 Jiri Novak #39 Match data
Sep 2, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Haas #15 6-3 6-4 6-2 Jiri Novak #41 Match data
May 10, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jiri Novak #40 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Tommy Haas #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15