H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 5-1

Jiri Novak holds a 5–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2006 Hamburg Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Novak
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Robredo #12 6-3 6-2 Jiri Novak #128 Match data
Mar 24, 2005* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jiri Novak #26 (w/o) Tommy Robredo #13 Match data
Oct 29, 2004* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jiri Novak #20 (w/o) Tommy Robredo #12 Match data
Mar 1, 2003* Dubai ATP 250 SF Hard Jiri Novak #10 6-4 6-1 Tommy Robredo #34 Match data
Oct 17, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jiri Novak #9 6-1 6-1 Tommy Robredo #38 Match data
Jul 20, 2002* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Jiri Novak #15 6-4 6-2 Tommy Robredo #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12