H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Jiri Novak vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-0
Jiri Novak holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Novak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2004 Shanghai third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Novak | 6-2 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 318 | 250 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jiri Novak | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #24 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |