H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Prakash Amritraj H2H: 2-0
Jiri Vanek holds a 2–0 lead over Prakash Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2005 Ho Chi Minh City third round 6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jiri Vanek | 6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2003* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Vanek | 6-2 6-2 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,584 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #714 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |