H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 2-1
Jiri Vesely holds a 2–1 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jiri Vesely leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2018 Buenos Aires third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2018* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 6-0 6-3 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-3 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2015* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-1 6-4 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |