H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 3-0
Jiri Vesely holds a 3–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2017 Hamburg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-4 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2017* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 6-4 6-3 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2016* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Jiri Vesely | 6-4 6-3 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |