H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-1
Jiri Vesely holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2018 Geneva third round 2-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 2-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2016* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 6-4 6-2 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-2 7-6(6) 7-5 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |