H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-2
Malek Jaziri holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Vesely in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Malek Jaziri leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Malek Jaziri won the 2022 Marrakech third round 6-7(6) 6-3 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2022* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Malek Jaziri | 6-7(6) 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| May 5, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Malek Jaziri | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2015* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-3 6-1 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| May 28, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-3 6-3 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |