H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 3-1
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 3–1 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2012 Metz final 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2012* | Metz | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-1 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Nov 11, 2011* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 6-4 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 7-6(1) 7-6(5) | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2008* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |