H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 3-3

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and Ernests Gulbis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2016 Roland Garros third round 2-5 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #80 2-5 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 Match data
Feb 23, 2014* Marseille ATP 250 F Hard Ernests Gulbis #23 7-6(5) 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 Match data
Jun 27, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Ernests Gulbis #39 3-6 6-3 6-3 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 4-6 6-4 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #98 Match data
Oct 2, 2009* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Ernests Gulbis #99 Match data
Jan 4, 2008* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #43 6-3 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18 — — — — — — —
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18 — — — — — — —