H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-2

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2015 Cincinnati Masters second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2015* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #43 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #19 Match data
May 10, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 4-6 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #46 Match data
Apr 20, 2012* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #5 7-6(7) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #19 Match data
Sep 4, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #11 6-3 7-5 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #19 Match data
Jan 29, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Fernando Verdasco #15 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 6-2 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7