H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 5-1

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 5–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2012 Wimbledon second round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 6-3.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #6 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #92 Match data
Nov 10, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 Match data
Jan 7, 2011* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #13 7-6(4) 7-6(9) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #33 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #39 6-2 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 Match data
Mar 27, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 6-4 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #41 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #38 6-3 6-4 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18