H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2004 Beijing fourth round 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |