H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Igor Andreev H2H: 1-1

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and Igor Andreev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2011 Roland Garros second round 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #17 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 Igor Andreev #92 Match data May 26, 2011* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Igor Andreev #23 7-5 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #11 Match data Mar 17, 2009* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #297 #5 5,230 2,200 449 230 66.1% 0 2 0 2 14 18
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,771 0 0 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 2,005 0 2 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,977 0 5 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,975 0 5 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,139 0 7 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2012 54–24 69.2% #8 2,053 0 9 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,052 0 10 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,067 0 11 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,088 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 2016 35–16 68.6% #12 2,132 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,018 0 16 — — — — — — —
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,930 0 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,971 0 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,911 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,741 0 18 — — — — — — —
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #297 1,685 0 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Igor Andreev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
22 2007 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2008 26 11 37 70.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 41 15 56 73.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2010 18 9 27 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2011 40 15 55 72.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 36 16 52 69.2% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2013 22 10 32 68.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2014 22 11 33 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 20 9 29 69.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 24 10 34 70.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 27 10 37 73.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 22 10 32 68.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 313 149 462 67.7% 77 54 131 58.8% 52 24 76 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 664/679 of Jo-Wilfried Tsonga's and 427/439 of Igor Andreev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Igor Andreev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 4/4 5.8 2.8 61.4% 76.4% 39.6% 67.9% 56.0% 61.9% 33.4% 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5%
20 2005 1/1 9.0 5.0 52.9% 51.1% 60.0% 58.3% 12.5% 55.3% 29.3% 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9%
22 2007 24/24 8.7 2.0 65.0% 75.9% 52.5% 55.3% 39.9% 67.7% 34.9% 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6%
23 2008 47/48 10.6 2.2 64.2% 77.4% 52.1% 63.0% 43.4% 68.2% 36.8% 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2%
24 2009 66/68 10.4 2.3 63.4% 81.1% 55.0% 67.0% 40.1% 71.6% 36.2% 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8%
25 2010 45/45 10.7 2.7 61.8% 75.4% 51.9% 65.5% 47.6% 66.3% 36.4% 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1%
26 2011 77/79 10.7 2.6 61.8% 78.8% 52.6% 63.1% 50.0% 69.0% 36.0% 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2012 72/78 8.4 1.9 62.1% 76.3% 53.4% 68.4% 46.9% 67.6% 38.3% 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9%
28 2013 52/52 8.3 2.1 62.9% 76.1% 54.3% 64.8% 45.2% 68.0% 36.4% 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1%
29 2014 50/51 10.7 2.3 61.3% 77.1% 54.5% 64.6% 38.2% 68.4% 34.4% 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5%
30 2015 47/47 10.6 2.8 62.0% 78.7% 54.1% 60.5% 46.6% 69.6% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 49/51 9.1 3.3 60.0% 78.4% 52.0% 69.1% 40.6% 67.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 49/50 9.9 2.3 60.9% 81.0% 54.4% 60.1% 42.1% 70.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 11/11 12.5 3.3 61.4% 79.0% 56.9% 70.6% 24.8% 70.3% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 50/50 10.7 2.3 61.0% 80.1% 53.0% 69.2% 44.5% 69.4% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 2/2 6.5 2.0 68.7% 73.3% 43.1% 33.3% 0.0% 63.7% 23.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 9/9 8.3 2.7 56.9% 67.1% 48.3% 51.6% 38.3% 59.1% 27.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 9/9 6.8 2.7 57.3% 76.8% 49.1% 67.6% 30.1% 64.9% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 664/679 9.9 2.4 62.0% 77.9% 53.2% 64.6% 43.5% 68.5% 36.0% — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Igor Andreev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1503 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1550 114.5 +1.00 +1.73 0.877 48.5% +13 — — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.33 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48
20 2005 1547 104.1 -1.25 +9.24 0.655 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.26 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95
22 2007 1772 144.4 +3.90 -0.24 1.081 50.9% -58 — -24 55.7% +0.10 3–2 (60%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.05 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16
23 2008 2006 161.2 +5.43 +1.33 1.158 52.2% +22 -410 — 63.7% +0.73 13–4 (76%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.72 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84
24 2009 1978 161.9 +7.06 +0.12 1.272 53.4% +50 -261 -189 67.9% +1.07 9–5 (64%) 25–16 (61%) — +3.38 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72
25 2010 1976 159.1 +3.23 +0.88 1.081 51.3% +46 -156 -89 64.2% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 10–10 (50%) — +0.91 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05
26 2011 2139 168.0 +6.19 +0.63 1.160 52.5% -5 -258 -33 65.7% +0.85 16–10 (62%) 25–17 (60%) — -1.73 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32
27 2012 2054 168.8 +4.94 +2.40 1.183 53.0% +1 -53 +149 65.8% +0.91 8–10 (44%) 22–15 (59%) — +0.31 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23
28 2013 2053 170.3 +4.97 +0.63 1.138 52.4% +12 +71 +87 66.7% +0.99 11–5 (69%) 17–13 (57%) — +0.31 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74
29 2014 2068 165.6 +4.80 -0.59 1.088 51.4% -19 +63 +90 61.7% +0.65 10–4 (71%) 18–8 (69%) — -0.68 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13
30 2015 2089 165.4 +4.96 +1.31 1.210 52.6% +5 +64 +46 62.4% +0.81 14–5 (74%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 2132 166.6 +3.93 +0.99 1.114 52.0% +5 -75 +62 66.4% +0.87 8–4 (67%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2019 164.7 +5.53 +2.66 1.311 53.7% +50 -4 +72 66.2% +1.15 9–7 (56%) 15–13 (54%) — +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1930 138.3 +2.62 -1.46 1.033 50.5% +30 — — 53.1% +0.06 3–4 (43%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1972 159.1 +4.86 -0.58 1.138 51.9% +1 -22 +124 61.2% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 21–8 (72%) — -2.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1911 101.6 -0.39 -2.28 0.657 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1741 102.6 -2.79 -6.03 0.659 44.4% +103 +113 — 22.7% -1.64 1–1 1–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1686 128.9 +0.39 -2.13 0.835 47.6% +113 +114 — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 2–5 (29%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2200 169.4 +4.88 +0.70 1.145 52.1% +15 -62 +34 63.1% +0.75 121–74 (62%) 215–158 (58%) 107.0 -0.04 — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.