H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 3-0

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 3–0 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #202 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #43 6-4 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #21 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #121 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Lleyton Hewitt #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 — — — — — — — 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18 — — — — — — —
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18 — — — — — — —