H2H data updated: 2026-08-09 02:15 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Lukas Dlouhy H2H: 1-0
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Dlouhy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2008 Bangkok fourth round 7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(1) | Lukas Dlouhy | Match data | Sep 26, 2008* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,199 | 449 | 230 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Lukas Dlouhy | #1,702 | #73 | 529 | 1,607 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Lukas Dlouhy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #99 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,977 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,975 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,139 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #459 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #8 | 2,053 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,052 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,068 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,088 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #12 | 2,131 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,018 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,929 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,971 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,685 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |