H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-1
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Vienna fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 6-4 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2015* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| May 5, 2015* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 7-5 6-3 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2012* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 6-4 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |