H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 7-0

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 7–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2016 Roland Garros second round 6-7(6) 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-2.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-7(6) 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #39 Match data
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #46 Match data
Mar 24, 2014* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #11 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #143 Match data
Oct 20, 2012* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 6-4 4-6 5-2 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #33 Match data
Oct 12, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #6 6-2 7-6(2) Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data
Feb 29, 2012* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #5 7-6(2) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #46 Match data
May 10, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #18 6-3 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18