H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2007 Beijing fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2007* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 6-4 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |