H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 1-0
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2007 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |