H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-1
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 2–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2012 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-3 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2008* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |