H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 4-3

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 4–3 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2013 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-3 6-3.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 4, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 6-3 6-3 6-3 Viktor Troicki #57 Match data
Mar 23, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 7-6(6) 6-3 Viktor Troicki #44 Match data
May 16, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #5 6-3 6-2 Viktor Troicki #29 Match data
Oct 22, 2010* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Hard Viktor Troicki #43 3-6 6-3 7-5 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #13 Match data
Apr 28, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 6-2 6-3 Viktor Troicki #37 Match data
Oct 3, 2009* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Viktor Troicki #32 1-6 6-2 6-3 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #7 Match data
Oct 3, 2008* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Viktor Troicki #65 5-7 2-1 (ret.) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo-Wilfried Tsonga Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18