H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Joachim Johansson vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Joachim Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joachim Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2004 Memphis third round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Joachim Johansson | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |