H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Joakim Nystrom vs Chip Hooper H2H: 2-1
Joakim Nystrom holds a 2–1 lead over Chip Hooper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Joakim Nystrom leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1987 Rotterdam fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1987* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Chip Hooper | 6-4 6-4 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Joakim Nystrom | 6-4 7-5 6-1 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1985* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Joakim Nystrom | 6-3 6-4 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | Chip Hooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |