H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Joakim Nystrom vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-0
Joakim Nystrom holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1982 Roland Garros first round 1-6 7-6 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 1-6 7-6 6-0 6-0 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |