Joakim Nystrom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 6, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Joakim Nystrom and John Lloyd are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on carpet, while John Lloyd leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Lloyd won the 1985 Australian Open round of 16 6-2 1-6 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Lloyd | 6-2 1-6 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data | Dec 4, 1985* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Joakim Nystrom | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | John Lloyd | Match data | Mar 15, 1985* | R16 | Brussels | ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,121 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| John Lloyd | — | — | — | 1,885 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | John Lloyd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,943 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,926 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,730 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | John Lloyd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1973 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1974 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1983 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1984 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1976 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1985 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1977 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 23 | 1986 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 1978 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 24 | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1979 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 25 | 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1981 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 60 | 31 | 91 | 65.9% | 138 | 70 | 208 | 66.3% | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% | — | 57 | 60 | 117 | 48.7% | 43 | 70 | 113 | 38.1% | 45 | 50 | 95 | 47.4% | 28 | 48 | 76 | 36.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | John Lloyd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1487 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1492 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 1972 | 1490 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1645 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +23 | -103 | 46.8% | -0.24 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–5 (0%) | 104.2 | -0.49 | 1973 | 1512 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +71 | +36 | -13 | 41.8% | -0.78 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–0 | — | +1.06 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1618 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +115 | — | 43.5% | -0.32 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.7 | -0.22 | 1974 | 1608 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -131 | +66 | 44.3% | -0.49 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.7 | +1.47 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1868 | 149.9 | — | — | — | — | -235 | -70 | -111 | 63.6% | +0.95 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 108.2 | +0.17 | 1975 | 1629 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -42 | -59 | +41 | 41.6% | -0.66 | 5–11 (31%) | 5–7 (42%) | 97.4 | +0.19 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1969 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -15 | -234 | 65.1% | +0.98 | 19–4 (83%) | 15–8 (65%) | 115.0 | -0.15 | 1976 | 1698 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -113 | -42 | 46.0% | -0.44 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.6 | -0.63 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1943 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +26 | -150 | 65.8% | +1.19 | 12–9 (57%) | 12–5 (71%) | 100.2 | +0.33 | 1977 | 1833 | 144.8 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -264 | -67 | 51.1% | -0.04 | 5–12 (29%) | 10–6 (63%) | 100.1 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1926 | 163.8 | — | — | — | — | +108 | +4 | -113 | 70.2% | +1.58 | 13–7 (65%) | 11–5 (69%) | 103.2 | -0.15 | 1978 | 1746 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -97 | +34 | 46.9% | -0.47 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.5 | -2.65 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1880 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +138 | -78 | 62.8% | +0.97 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–5 (64%) | 103.3 | -0.40 | 1979 | 1685 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +23 | +19 | 41.6% | -0.61 | 4–7 (36%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.9 | -0.99 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1730 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +142 | +66 | 47.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.9 | -1.25 | 1980 | 1602 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +80 | +77 | 17.4% | -2.74 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1608 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +152 | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.53 | 1981 | 1683 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -34 | — | +12 | 40.5% | -0.84 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | 108.1 | -1.96 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1604 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +102 | -8 | 39.3% | -0.92 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.8 | -1.59 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1681 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -22 | -15 | 49.2% | +0.16 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.8 | +0.42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1785 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -113 | -176 | 50.0% | -0.08 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.6 | -1.67 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1823 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -53 | -163 | -75 | 52.3% | +0.16 | 6–5 (55%) | 10–13 (43%) | 98.6 | -1.54 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1723 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -84 | — | 41.9% | -0.68 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -1.47 |
| Career | — | 2121 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +44 | -117 | 60.9% | +0.82 | 76–41 (65%) | 57–41 (58%) | 108.6 | -0.43 | — | 1886 | 141.0 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -82 | -13 | 45.3% | -0.43 | 56–69 (45%) | 60–54 (53%) | 103.6 | -2.38 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 27, 1985 | — |
| Wojtek Fibak | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 13, 1985 | — |
| Peter Fleming | 1 | 5 | 6 | Nov 9, 1984 | — |
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 2 | 6 | Sep 29, 1978 | — |
| Dick Crealy | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 27, 1978 | — |