H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Joakim Nystrom vs Kent Carlsson H2H: 3-1
Joakim Nystrom holds a 3–1 lead over Kent Carlsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joakim Nystrom leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1987 Bastad quarterfinal 6-2 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1987* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Kent Carlsson | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Kent Carlsson | 6-1 7-5 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| May 17, 1987* | Rome | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Kent Carlsson | Match data |
| May 4, 1986* | Madrid | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 6-1 6-1 | Kent Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Kent Carlsson | #625 | #6 | 60 | 2,063 | 155 | 57 | 73.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joakim Nystrom | Kent Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #138 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #13 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #12 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 48–8 | 85.7% | #6 | 2,049 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #309 | 1,892 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |