H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Joao Fonseca vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 0-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Fonseca in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2025 BNP Paribas Fortis European Open third round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 19
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025* | BNP Paribas Fortis European Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-5 7-6 | Joao Fonseca | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Fonseca | #27 | #24 | 1,735 | 1,949 | 46 | 35 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Fonseca | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2024 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2025 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |