Joao Fonseca
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Tabilo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Casper Ruud | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jakub Mensik | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 2, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-11 00:00 UTC
Joao Fonseca holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joao Fonseca leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joao Fonseca won the 2026 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Fonseca | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-3 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data | Jun 29, 2026 | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Fonseca | #29 | #24 | 1,800 | 1,952 | 49 | 36 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #243 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,104 | 415 | 296 | 58.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Fonseca | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2024 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2025 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,029 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #14 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,934 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,845 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,878 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,813 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #243 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Joao Fonseca | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2023 | 1493 | 100.6 | -2.62 | -2.73 | 0.592 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2024 | 1553 | 119.8 | -1.28 | +1.17 | 1.009 | 50.4% | — | +43 | — | 50.0% | +0.23 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.6 | +0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2025 | 1827 | 147.7 | +1.99 | +0.65 | 1.057 | 50.6% | -37 | -102 | -209 | 56.4% | +0.31 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–13 (50%) | 109.6 | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2026 | 1918 | 153.5 | +1.36 | +2.34 | 1.070 | 51.4% | -50 | -29 | -272 | 58.0% | +0.43 | 5–6 (45%) | 11–6 (65%) | 105.5 | -1.28 | 2007 | 1516 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1520 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1552 | 103.5 | +1.07 | -0.83 | 0.875 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1512 | 104.6 | +2.71 | -1.02 | 0.798 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | 0.00 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1527 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1658 | 125.8 | -3.50 | +0.03 | 0.904 | 47.8% | +40 | — | — | 24.1% | -1.07 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1801 | 149.4 | -1.14 | +2.56 | 1.049 | 50.8% | -5 | -134 | -122 | 55.2% | +0.16 | 9–7 (56%) | 16–4 (80%) | 112.8 | +0.31 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2030 | 165.9 | +1.17 | +3.88 | 1.135 | 52.4% | -48 | -120 | -136 | 63.1% | +0.79 | 16–6 (73%) | 12–7 (63%) | 111.4 | +0.17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1997 | 164.8 | +2.59 | +2.45 | 1.136 | 52.3% | +5 | -85 | -72 | 58.5% | +0.74 | 8–11 (42%) | 11–12 (48%) | 95.5 | -0.10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1993 | 166.6 | +0.70 | +3.83 | 1.115 | 52.0% | +18 | -28 | -84 | 60.2% | +0.64 | 16–10 (62%) | 18–13 (58%) | 101.1 | +1.33 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2004 | 165.0 | +2.13 | +5.30 | 1.216 | 53.4% | +17 | -43 | -69 | 64.5% | +0.96 | 9–9 (50%) | 18–15 (55%) | 98.3 | +1.62 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1934 | 153.9 | +1.51 | +3.16 | 1.139 | 52.4% | +2 | +33 | +16 | 58.9% | +0.65 | 13–4 (76%) | 10–15 (40%) | 100.4 | +1.35 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1945 | 168.2 | +2.85 | +3.28 | 1.198 | 52.6% | +17 | -23 | +127 | 62.6% | +0.84 | 13–10 (57%) | 8–14 (36%) | 96.4 | -1.44 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1963 | 158.1 | +0.25 | +4.32 | 1.148 | 52.4% | +5 | -47 | — | 61.8% | +0.84 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.6 | -0.99 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1845 | 157.0 | +1.63 | +3.89 | 1.161 | 52.3% | +59 | +10 | +180 | 55.6% | +0.44 | 7–11 (39%) | 9–12 (43%) | 90.9 | +0.34 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1879 | 155.5 | +1.66 | +3.64 | 1.172 | 52.8% | +3 | -22 | +178 | 60.7% | +0.92 | 5–8 (38%) | 10–11 (48%) | 94.4 | +1.54 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1747 | 145.2 | +1.16 | +0.69 | 1.049 | 50.3% | +31 | +36 | +265 | 47.1% | +0.03 | 8–8 (50%) | 12–12 (50%) | 98.4 | +0.23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1814 | 141.9 | -0.50 | +1.21 | 1.022 | 50.6% | -33 | -28 | +201 | 51.8% | +0.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 11–5 (69%) | 102.5 | -0.45 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1771 | 133.9 | -1.44 | +0.34 | 0.951 | 49.2% | -82 | -25 | +183 | 39.6% | -0.44 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–11 (35%) | 97.4 | -1.65 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1632 | 116.3 | -4.50 | -4.04 | 0.670 | 44.6% | +42 | +10 | — | 27.5% | -1.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.2 | -0.11 |
| Career | — | 1953 | 147.7 | +1.25 | +1.34 | 1.046 | 50.7% | -42 | -33 | -234 | 55.8% | +0.30 | 15–14 (52%) | 27–21 (56%) | 110.2 | -1.14 | — | 2104 | 160.3 | +0.94 | +2.86 | 1.103 | 51.7% | +5 | -39 | +70 | 56.5% | +0.48 | 125–104 (55%) | 151–142 (52%) | 99.9 | +0.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Tabilo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Casper Ruud | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jakub Mensik | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | 6 | 6 | 12 | Mar 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 3 | 9 | 12 | Aug 28, 2020 | H2H |
| Fabio Fognini | 4 | 7 | 11 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Richard Gasquet | 8 | 2 | 10 | Feb 8, 2024 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 9 | 9 | Jun 22, 2019 | H2H |