H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Joao Souza vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 0-1
Robby Ginepri holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Souza in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2011 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Joao Souza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Souza | #1,306 | #69 | 687 | 1,669 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Souza | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #142 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |