H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Joern Renzenbrink vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 1-0

Joern Renzenbrink holds a 1–0 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joern Renzenbrink leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joern Renzenbrink won the 1995 Marseille round of 16 5-7 7-6(9) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joern Renzenbrink
GER Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joern Renzenbrink #107 5-7 7-6(9) 6-4 Carl Uwe Steeb #93 Match data Feb 10, 1995* R16 Marseille ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joern Renzenbrink #1,192 #70 614 1,711 34 54 38.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,930 194 192 50.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joern Renzenbrink Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,632 0 0
20 1993 8–11 42.1% #110 1,565 0 0 1988 22–19 53.7% #73 1,726 0 0
21 1994 17–19 47.2% #92 1,653 0 0 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,864 0 1
22 1995 6–17 26.1% #168 1,517 0 0 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,714 0 1
23 1996 3–7 30.0% #281 1,497 0 0 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,744 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1992 33–25 56.9% #29 1,791 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,719 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,608 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,661 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Joern Renzenbrink Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1993 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 12 7 19 63.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1994 13 8 21 61.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 10 5 15 66.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1995 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 11 12 8.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
Career — 24 27 51 47.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 5 9 14 35.7% — 65 59 124 52.4% 76 79 155 49.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 51 47 98 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 79/88 of Joern Renzenbrink's and 209/230 of Carl Uwe Steeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Joern Renzenbrink Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 17/19 5.9 6.4 54.8% 73.0% 47.0% 60.2% 32.1% 61.0% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 34/36 9.2 6.1 61.6% 74.6% 46.2% 62.8% 39.0% 63.6% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 22/23 8.0 5.5 60.3% 71.1% 45.1% 46.3% 35.0% 60.9% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 6/10 5.0 6.2 62.2% 72.5% 43.5% 59.6% 33.1% 60.8% 32.7% 1991 51/54 2.7 1.2 61.2% 67.6% 49.6% 48.1% 45.2% 60.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 55/58 3.2 1.9 58.9% 67.9% 53.4% 64.4% 43.7% 61.9% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 34/38 2.5 1.6 57.8% 66.3% 51.1% 55.0% 47.7% 59.7% 36.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 23/26 2.7 1.8 56.9% 65.4% 49.3% 60.7% 43.5% 58.5% 36.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 23/28 2.3 2.5 59.8% 65.0% 47.9% 52.5% 33.5% 57.9% 34.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 23/26 2.7 1.9 59.2% 64.9% 49.9% 49.5% 47.6% 58.7% 33.2%
Career — 79/88 7.8 6.0 59.8% 73.1% 45.9% 57.4% 36.0% 62.1% 34.3% — 209/386 2.8 1.7 59.2% 66.6% 50.7% 55.5% 44.0% 60.1% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joern Renzenbrink Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1500 106.6 — — — — — +53 — 38.5% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1632 137.8 — — — — — +51 — 56.8% +0.68 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 -0.23
20 1993 1565 122.5 -0.29 -1.18 0.911 48.7% +41 -42 — 43.5% -0.83 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +0.11 1988 1727 139.0 — — — — +24 -102 — 50.9% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 -1.36
21 1994 1654 129.2 +0.67 -1.77 0.974 49.8% +19 -128 -105 53.7% +0.06 1–10 (9%) 11–9 (55%) 91.7 +1.13 1989 1864 154.0 — — — — -24 -14 — 64.5% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 104.0 -3.00
22 1995 1518 114.0 -1.20 -3.75 0.820 46.4% +41 +23 -2 32.1% -1.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) 99.3 +0.74 1990 1714 147.4 — — — — +45 +75 — 50.5% 0.00 9–12 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 -1.11
23 1996 1498 106.4 -1.51 -2.26 0.833 47.0% +49 — — 23.8% -1.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.64 1991 1745 142.9 -0.05 +1.22 1.026 50.4% -8 +21 — 51.1% +0.12 9–10 (47%) 8–8 (50%) 98.5 -0.15
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1792 145.3 +1.00 +1.59 1.033 50.7% -24 0 — 56.7% +0.47 11–8 (58%) 12–14 (46%) 100.5 -1.66
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1720 139.0 -0.63 -0.51 0.908 48.4% -7 +55 -191 48.3% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.5 -1.90
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1608 124.8 -1.75 -2.12 0.882 47.6% +102 -18 — 34.5% -0.81 3–6 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 92.8 -0.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 130.9 -2.93 -2.02 0.819 46.2% +75 -78 — 41.2% -0.78 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -0.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1541 120.5 -2.41 -2.73 0.804 46.4% +38 +14 — 34.9% -1.25 2–6 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -0.46
Career — 1712 124.2 -0.22 -2.23 0.905 48.4% +33 -56 -59 43.1% -0.59 7–20 (26%) 21–19 (53%) 93.2 +2.98 — 1931 147.2 -0.63 -0.12 0.942 48.9% +17 +3 -191 50.9% +0.04 68–66 (51%) 57–60 (49%) 99.0 -2.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.