H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joey Rive vs Danie Visser H2H: 2-0
Joey Rive holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joey Rive leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joey Rive won the 1988 Stratton Mountain second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1988* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Joey Rive | 7-6 6-4 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1988* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Joey Rive | 7-6 6-1 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joey Rive | #968 | #57 | 331 | 1,737 | 54 | 71 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joey Rive | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #497 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #80 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |